Nurse Writing Services

NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 3 Educational Technologies Comparison

New Samples

Struggling With Your Assessments? Get Help From Our Tutors

    NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 3 Educational Technologies Comparison

    Student Name

    Capella University

    NURS-FPX 6109 Integrating Technology into Nursing Education

    Prof. Name

    Date

    Part 1

    The infusion of technology into the realm of education has triggered a paradigm shift in pedagogical approaches. A notable advancement in this context is the emergence of Learning Management Systems (LMSs), profoundly influencing nursing education. These platforms have revolutionized the delivery and administration of nursing education, offering an interactive learning experience. This assessment aims to scrutinize two widely utilized LMSs, namely Canvas and Blackboard, evaluating their respective features, advantages, and capabilities. The primary objective is to ascertain which system is most suitable for teaching and learning scenarios in nursing education.

    Description of Technology

    In the realm of nursing education, an LMS denotes a software application employed by educators to formulate, administer, and disseminate courses and programs to students. It plays a pivotal role in managing records, overseeing courses, monitoring student progress, and sharing educational materials. These systems typically encompass collaborative features, enabling educators to create and integrate course content, articulate learning objectives, align content with assessments, and track student advancement (Hermosisima et al., 2023).

    The two specific LMS platforms under examination are Canvas and Blackboard. Canvas is an LMS renowned for its reliable, customizable, adaptable, and mobile-friendly platform, designed to facilitate the creation of a digital learning environment tailored to the unique challenges of specific contexts. Conversely, Blackboard, an established player in the LMS market, offers a suite of educational tools for course management, a virtual learning environment, and services such as gradebooks, mass notification services, and plagiarism detection software (Liu & Yu, 2022).

    Comparison of Features, Benefits, and Capabilities

    Feature, Capability, and Benefit

    • Version 1 (CANVAS):
      • User Interface: Canvas is acclaimed for its clean, intuitive, and modern UI, with a user-friendly dashboard and course navigation, even for those with limited tech experience.
      • Customization: Canvas allows a high level of customization for educators and learners to tailor their learning environments according to preferences or institutional needs.
      • Mobile Access: Canvas provides a comprehensive mobile app, ensuring a seamless experience across devices.
      • Integration with Third-Party Apps: Canvas excels in extensive integration options with third-party apps, enriching functionality and offering a tailored learning environment.
      • Learning Analytics: Canvas provides comprehensive analytics tools for tracking student progress and engagement, informing instructional decisions.
    • Version 2 (BLACKBOARD):
      • User Interface: Blackboard’s UI is robust but has a steeper learning curve, requiring more familiarization time for new users.
      • Customization: Blackboard allows customization, though not as flexible or comprehensive as Canvas.
      • Mobile Access: Blackboard offers a functional mobile app but with fewer features compared to its web interface or the Canvas mobile app.
      • Integration with Third-Party Apps: While Blackboard also offers integration with third-party apps, the options are not as extensive as Canvas.
      • Learning Analytics: Blackboard provides analytics capabilities, though they may not be as extensive or user-friendly as Canvas’s analytics tools.

    Part 2

    Assumptions

    The comparison between Canvas and Blackboard is based on certain assumptions. It assumes users possess the necessary hardware and stable internet access, as well as a basic understanding of computers to effectively navigate and use these online platforms. Both Canvas and Blackboard function as Learning Management Systems (LMSs) but differ in user interface, customization options, mobile accessibility, integration with third-party apps, and the ability to analyze learning data. This comparison serves as a foundation for decision-making in nursing education settings (Aithal & Aithal, 2023; Mahmoud & Withorn, 2023).

    Benefits and Limitations of Comparing Similar Educational Technologies

    Comparing Canvas and Blackboard offers valuable insights for decision-making. By juxtaposing their features, benefits, and capabilities, decision-makers can make informed choices. The analysis reveals Canvas’s superiority in user interface and integration with third-party tools, crucial for those prioritizing user experience and technological adaptability (Hermosisima et al., 2023). However, it’s essential to acknowledge the limitations of this comparative approach. While it facilitates feature evaluation, it may not fully encapsulate the diverse user experiences offered by each platform. User preferences play a role, and institutions should consider the specific needs, preferences, and financial capabilities before making decisions (Liu & Yu, 2022).

    In conclusion, while this comparison serves as a starting point, decision-makers must augment it with institution-specific research to make well-informed choices tailored to their needs, user preferences, and financial capacities.

    Analysis

    Suitable Teaching and Learning Situations

    When considering the use of Canvas and Blackboard in teaching and learning, their unique characteristics dictate suitability. Canvas excels in dynamic learning environments embracing technology, offering a modern interface, customization options, mobile app compatibility, and extensive third-party integration. It suits scenarios where educators wish to experiment with analytics for tracking student progress and adapting teaching methods accordingly (Biliuk et al., 2023).

    Conversely, Blackboard’s strengths lie in its reputation and comprehensive feature set. It remains a reliable choice for institutions valuing stability and functionality over cutting-edge design. Blackboard suits teaching environments where users prefer a familiar platform and may not require extensive customization or third-party integrations (Biliuk et al., 2023; Hermosisima et al., 2023). The decision between Canvas and Blackboard hinges on the specific needs and context of teaching and learning scenarios.

    Incorporating Technology into a Specific Program

    Integrating an LMS like Canvas or Blackboard into a nursing education program can revolutionize teaching and learning. Canvas, with its user-friendly interface and customization options, serves as a hub for delivering various educational resources. Its mobile app and third-party integration facilitate seamless access to study materials, and analytics tools offer valuable insights for adapting teaching strategies (Biliuk et al., 2023; Wittenberg et al., 2021).

    Incorporating Blackboard focuses on leveraging its robustness and comprehensive features. While its interface may require acclimatization, the platform provides a stable online learning environment. Blackboard’s analytics capabilities, although not as extensive as Canvas, still offer insights for educators to track student progress (Biliuk et al., 2023).

    Conclusion

    The comparison and analysis of Canvas and Blackboard emphasize the contextual relevance of selecting educational technologies. Both LMSs offer robust features, enhancing teaching, learning, and assessment in nursing education. The choice between Canvas and Blackboard should align with specific institutional needs, resources, and objectives. Canvas may be ideal for those valuing user experience and extensive integrations, while Blackboard suits those prioritizing stability and a comprehensive feature set. Decision-makers should consider their circumstances and requirements for an informed decision in teaching and learning scenarios (Aithal & Aithal, 2023; Mahmoud & Withorn, 2023).

    References

    Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2023, May 20). Stakeholders’ analysis of the effect of ubiquitous education technologies on higher education. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4453569

    Biliuk, O., Stepanenko, O., & Kyrychenko, V. (2023). Modern tools for distance education: Information and analytical prospectus. Futurity Education, 3(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.06.25.15

    Mahmoud, S., & Withorn, T. (2023). Faculty-librarian collaboration to enhance information literacy skills in an online nursing course. Nursing Education Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001145

    NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 3 Educational Technologies Comparison

    Hermosisima, M. C. R., Mobo, F. D., & Cutillas, A. L. (2023). Enhanced learning continuity framework using online teaching as alternative delivery modality. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(5), 1521–1534. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.05.14

    Liu, M., & Yu, D. (2022). Towards intelligent E-learning systems. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11479-6

    Wittenberg, E., Johnson, R. R., & Tayyeb, A. R. (2021). Utilizing an online communication module with baccalaureate nursing students to teach leadership in team meetings. Nursing Education Perspectives, Publish Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000914

    NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 3 Educational Technologies Comparison