Nurse Writing Services

NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 1 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders

New Samples

Struggling With Your Assessments? Get Help From Our Tutors

    NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 1 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders

    Student Name

    Capella University

    NURS-FPX 6416 Managing the Nursing Informatics Life Cycle

    Prof. Name

    Date

    Introduction and Stakeholder Needs Assessment Meeting

    Greetings, I am _________, the Nursing Informatics Master and Project Manager at Vila Wellbeing. Several days ago, we convened a meeting with five key stakeholders to deliberate on the existing health information system. The primary objective of this meeting was to elicit feedback from stakeholders and ascertain their perspectives on the necessity of modifications to the health information system. In this presentation, I will offer a synopsis of the meeting’s salient points and outcomes, along with a preview of the forthcoming system changes.

    In my capacity as the Nursing Informatics Master and Project Manager at Vila Wellbeing, my responsibility encompasses the implementation of changes to the organization’s information system. These modifications are geared towards augmenting healthcare accessibility for patients facing barriers, alleviating the workload on healthcare professionals, and enhancing overall health outcomes. The envisaged project implementation timeline spans approximately five to six months, incorporating training sessions, pilot testing, and stakeholder meetings.

    External pressures on Vila Wellbeing, stemming from factors such as the aging population, the rising prevalence of chronic diseases, and the persistent Sars-Cov-2 pandemic, underscore the need for proactive measures (Milella et al., 2021). The overarching goal of these changes at Vila Wellbeing is to deliver cutting-edge medical treatment within a welcoming and comfortable environment.

    Key Questions and Explanation

    Assessing the Current State and Desired State of the Data System: In stakeholder meetings, concerns were raised regarding challenges faced by nurses and healthcare professionals with the current health information system. Professionals expressed apprehensions that the existing system impedes patient tracking, posing risks to patient safety. Additionally, they observed that the absence of two-way communication with patients results in treatment delays.

    While the current health information system has improved cost management, reduced medication errors, and enhanced patient data accessibility for nurses, stakeholders believe that with sufficient resources and an upgrade to the current system, they can offer patients exemplary healthcare in a state-of-the-art facility, providing a pleasant experience and excellent care.

    Identifying and Defining Risks

    Healthcare providers have pointed out issues faced by patients due to the absence of remote patient monitoring (RPM) and patient portals in our current health information system. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted Vila Wellbeing’s ability to efficiently triage patients, particularly in rural areas where individuals with chronic illnesses requiring convenient access to care faced additional challenges (Annis et al., 2020; Noah et al., 2018). Professionals have lamented the lack of RPM in the current system, making it challenging to provide continuous care to patients with conditions like diabetes and hypertension.

    Defining Best Practices for Data System Users

    To substantiate my claims, I will draw upon evidence from published works. Malasinghe et al. (2018) reported that RPM was endorsed by professionals as a means of ensuring treatment continuity during the COVID-19 pandemic. RPM offers the advantage of replacing patient reporting in various systems, particularly benefiting patients with conditions like diabetes who may experience subtle changes between physical check-ups. Medication adherence and A1C levels are examples of crucial data that can be continuously provided to healthcare providers using RPM. Furthermore, patient portals have been found to enhance patient self-management, satisfaction, and early detection of patient needs or concerns, according to a study conducted by Chu et al. (2022).

    Utilization of Technology

    During discussions with stakeholders, it was unanimously agreed that applications for remote patient monitoring should be installed on their computers and mobile devices, with easy access to patient portals.

    Workflow and Communication

    The implementation of remote patient monitoring technologies is expected to enhance workflows by providing patients with a sense of support and connection as their health data is transmitted to healthcare providers. Personalized messages based on each patient’s unique profile will provide peace of mind. RPMs have the potential to increase net patient income, enhance competitive advantage, and improve reimbursement prospects by improving process efficiency, reducing administrative costs, and increasing staff productivity (Leon et al., 2022). RPM will also enhance communication, as it can provide 24-hour care by continuously collecting data and alerting professionals when specific parameters deviate from the norm.

    Data Capture

    Storing data in a centralized location, such as a patient portal, can save time for both providers and patients, eliminating the need to switch between multiple systems (Farias et al., 2019).

    Practice and Outcomes

    With the global population aging rapidly and an associated increase in health issues, remote patient monitoring (RPM) has emerged as a promising new approach. Unlike traditional patient monitoring confined to hospital rooms, advanced communication and sensor technologies now allow patients to continue their daily lives at home without compromising their care (Michaud et al., 2018). Patients with chronic conditions, the elderly, and preterm infants stand to benefit from remote healthcare monitoring. Modern medical equipment can monitor individuals in various ways depending on their condition or situation, with recent developments in contactless monitoring that only requires the patient to be within a few meters of the sensor (Michaud et al., 2018).

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, the escalating number of COVID-19 cases and the emergence of novel strains highlight the imperative to expand the use of evidence-supported RPM technologies. RPM technology holds the potential to augment healthcare delivery by supporting symptomatic patients before hospital admission and ensuring treatment continuity after discharge.

    References

    Annis, T., Pleasants, S., Hultman, G., Lindemann, E., Thompson, J. A., Billecke, S., Badlani, S., & Melton, G. B. (2020). Rapid implementation of a COVID-19 remote patient monitoring program. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(8), 1326–1330. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa097

    Chu, D., Lessard, D., Laymouna, M. A., Engler, K., Schuster, T., Ma, Y., Kronfli, N., Routy, J.-P., Hijal, T., Lacombe, K., Sheehan, N., Rougier, H., & Lebouché, B. (2022). Understanding the risks and benefits of a patient portal configured for HIV care: Patient and healthcare professional perspectives. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(2), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020314

    NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 1 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders

    Farias, F. A. C. de, Dagostini, C. M., Bicca, Y. de A., Falavigna, V. F., & Falavigna, A. (2019). Remote Patient Monitoring: A systematic review. Telemedicine and E-Health, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0066

    Leon, M. A., Pannunzio, V., & Kleinsmann, M. (2022). The impact of perioperative Remote Patient Monitoring on clinical staff workflows: Scoping review. JMIR Human Factors, 9(2), e37204. https://doi.org/10.2196/37204

    Malasinghe, L. P., Ramzan, N., & Dahal, K. (2018). Remote patient monitoring: a comprehensive study. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0598-x

    Michaud, T. L., Siahpush, M., Schwab, R. J., Eiland, L. A., DeVany, M., Hansen, G., Slachetka, T. S., Boilesen, E., Tak, H. J., Wilson, F. A., Wang, H., Pagán, J. A., & Su, D. (2018). Remote Patient Monitoring and clinical outcomes for postdischarge patients with type 2 diabetes. Population Health Management, 21(5), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2017.0175

    Milella, F., Minelli, E. A., Strozzi, F., & Croce, D. (2021). Change and innovation in healthcare: findings from literature. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, Volume 13, 395–408. https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s301169

    NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 1 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders

    Noah, B., Keller, M. S., Mosadeghi, S., Stein, L., Johl, S., Delshad, S., Tashjian, V. C., Lew, D., Kwan, J. T., Jusufagic, A., & Spiegel, B. M. R. (2018). Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Npj Digital Medicine, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-017-0002-4