Nurse Writing Services

NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 1 Comprehensive Needs Assessment

New Samples

Struggling With Your Assessments? Get Help From Our Tutors

    NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 1 Comprehensive Needs Assessment

    Student Name

    Capella University

    NURS-FPX 6610 Introduction to Care Coordination

    Prof. Name


    Comprehensive Assessment of Needs

    A thorough needs assessment is indispensable to assist healthcare professionals in leveraging various resources to improve patient care. This evaluation aims to identify gaps in patient care and devise strategies for overcoming them through care coordination. Additionally, it focuses on understanding patients’ needs and methods for assessing those needs. The importance of care coordination is emphasized, and various strategies to enhance patient care, including interdisciplinary team collaboration, are explored.

    Current Gaps in Patient Care

    The case of Mr. Decker, a 79-year-old diabetic patient, highlights existing gaps in patient care. His readmission due to an infected toe reveals issues such as financial constraints, inadequate post-discharge guidance, and the absence of follow-up evaluations by healthcare providers. Factors like his low-income status and lack of comprehensive information about post-discharge healthcare routines contribute to critical health conditions. The Patient-Centered Assessment Method, used to evaluate Mr. Decker’s needs, prioritizes an effort-based approach to address emotional aspects of care (Perazzo et al., 2020).

    Informational Needs for Optimal Patient Care

    To assess the current level of care, information such as Mr. Decker’s medical records (age, weight, allergies), emotional state, preferences, medical schedule, and religious beliefs is crucial. Gathering additional necessary data involves engaging in preliminary discussions with Mr. Decker and seeking information from his family, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations such as HIPAA.

    Societal, Economic, and Interdisciplinary Factors Affecting Patient Care

    Factors influencing patient care encompass financial crisis, aging, and limited social support. Mr. Decker’s age and economic status, belonging to a low-income family, contribute to the complexity of his health condition. The impact of less social support on post-discharge procedures and the potential complications related to aging in chronic patients, especially diabetics, are significant considerations.

    Professional Standards’ Influence on Patient Care and Coordination Outcomes

    National Quality Forum standards and the Care Coordination and Transition Management Logic Model provide benchmarks for safety and care coordination outcomes. These standards emphasize patient safety, quality care, and patient-centered approaches. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s care coordination evaluation benchmarks further enhance care coordination through methods such as communication and routine checkups, ensuring a patient-centered practice.

    Evidence-Based Practices for Successful Patient Care Coordination

    Evidence-based strategies like GENESIS, routine evaluation of older patients, and the sepsis six bundles offer effective approaches to managing elderly patients with infections. These practices focus on early recognition, continuous monitoring, and timely interventions to improve patient outcomes.

    Benefits of Multidisciplinary Approach to Patient Care

    A multidisciplinary approach enhances patient care by considering various aspects of a patient’s condition. For Mr. Decker, involving a nurse with elderly care experience, a psychologist, and a social worker in the treatment team could have led to a more comprehensive and effective care plan. This approach reduces errors, streamlines operations, and minimizes gaps in care, potentially decreasing readmissions.


    Care coordination is pivotal for improving overall patient care, and a comprehensive needs assessment is essential for identifying and addressing gaps. This includes considering societal, economic, and interdisciplinary factors, adhering to professional standards, and implementing evidence-based practices. A multidisciplinary approach further enhances patient care by considering diverse aspects of a patient’s well-being.


    Artiga, S., Orgera, K., & Pham, O. (2020). Issue brief disparities in health and health care: Five key questions and answers.

    Bleakley, G., & Cole, M. (2020). Recognition and management of sepsis: The nurse’s role. British Journal of Nursing, 29(21), 1248–1251.

    Hofmann, F., & Erben, M. J. (2020). Organizational transition management of circular business model innovations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2770–2788.

    Ko, H., Park, Y.-H., Cho, B., Lim, K.-C., Chang, S. J., Yi, Y. M., Noh, E.-Y., & Ryu, S.-I. (2019). Gender differences in health status, quality of life, and community service needs of older adults living alone. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 83, 239–245.

    NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 1 Comprehensive Needs Assessment

    Kregel, H. R., Murphy, P. B., Attia, M., Meyer, D. E., Morris, R. S., Onyema, E. C., Adams, S. D., Wade, C. E., Harvin, J. A., Kao, L. S., & Puzio, T. J. (2022). The geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor of complications in geriatric trauma patients. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 93(2), 195–199.

    LeRoith, D., Biessels, G. J., Braithwaite, S. S., Casanueva, F. F., Draznin, B., Halter, J. B., Hirsch, I. B., McDonnell, M. E., Molitch, M. E., Murad, M. H., & Sinclair, A. J. (2019). Treatment of diabetes in older adults: An endocrine society* clinical practice guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 104(5), 1520–1574.

    Liu, X., Xu, Y., An, M., & Zeng, Q. (2019). The risk factors for diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A meta-analysis. Plos one, 14(2), 0212574.

    Mertens, F., Debrulle, Z., Lindskog, E., Deliens, L., Deveugele, M., & Pype, P. (2020). Healthcare professionals’ experiences of inter-professional collaboration during patient’s transfers between care settings in palliative care: A focus group study. Palliative Medicine, 35(2), 026921632096874.

    NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 1 Comprehensive Needs Assessment

    Milgrom, J., Hirshler, Y., Reece, J., Holt, C., & Gemmill, A. W. (2019). Social support—A protective factor for depressed perinatal women? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8).

    Namburi, N., & Lee, L. S. (2022). National quality

    Ni, Y., Liu, S., Li, J., Dong, T., Tao, L., Yuan, L., & Yang, M. (2019). The effects of nurse-led multidisciplinary team management on glycosylated hemoglobin, quality of life, hospitalization, and help-seeking behavior of people with diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2019, 1–9.

    Villanueva, L. M.P., Palafox, B., Amit, A. M. L., Pepito, V. C. F., Ab-Majid, F., Ariffin, F., Balabanova, D., Isa, M.-R., Mat-Nasir, N., My, M., Renedo, A., Seguin, M. L., Yusoff, K., Dans, A. L., & Mckee, M. (2022). Prevalence, determinants and outcomes of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine use for hypertension among low-income households in Malaysia and the Philippines. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 22(1).

    Perazzo, M. F., Serra-Negra, J. M., Firmino, R. T., Pordeus, I. A., Júnior, P. A.M., & Paiva, S. M. (2020). Patient-centered assessments: How can they be used in dental clinical trials? Brazilian Oral Research, 34(2).

    Shah, S. M., & Khan, R. A. (2020). Secondary use of electronic health record: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Access, 1–1.