Nurse Writing Services

NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature

New Samples

Struggling With Your Assessments? Get Help From Our Tutors

    NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature

    Student Name

    Capella University

    NURS-FPX 8030 Evidence-Based Practice Process for the Nursing Doctoral Learner

    Prof. Name

    Date

    Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature on Diagnostic Errors

    The accurate diagnosis of medical conditions is a fundamental responsibility for healthcare providers. However, errors in diagnosis, including missed, incorrect, or delayed diagnoses, can lead to adverse outcomes (Abimanyi-Ochom et al., 2019).

    Challenges in Research on Diagnostic Errors

    The research on diagnostic errors faces challenges in defining, detecting, preventing, and discussing these errors. Furthermore, effectively measuring diagnostic errors remains elusive, with limited sources of valid and reliable data.

    Impact of Diagnostic Errors

    Such errors contribute to elevated healthcare costs, resulting from negative health outcomes, income loss, decreased productivity, and, in extreme cases, loss of life (Abimanyi-Ochom et al., 2019). Erosion of trust in the healthcare system can lead to dissatisfaction among patients and healthcare professionals. Therefore, there is a compelling need for effective interventions to mitigate diagnostic errors in clinical settings.

    PICOT Question

    Among adult patients in acute or ambulatory care settings (P), the presence of a clinical decision support system in a hospital (I), compared with its absence (C), can enhance diagnostic processes to reduce diagnostic errors (O), within 24 months of implementation (T).

    Critical Appraisal Tool

    The JBI Checklist for Systematic Reviews will be employed as the critical appraisal tool for evaluating articles in this study. This tool ensures the methodological quality of the studies and assesses the extent to which bias has been addressed in their design, conduct, and analysis. Given that the selected studies are largely systematic reviews, the JBI Checklist is deemed appropriate for its ability to provide robust evidence across various research questions.

    Annotated Bibliography

    Abimanyi-Ochom, J., et al. (2019). Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19(1), 1-14. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0901-1]

    This study explores communication and audit strategies to reduce diagnostic errors, emphasizing technology-based interventions like clinical decision support systems.

    Ronicke, S., et al. (2019). Can a decision support system accelerate rare disease diagnosis? Evaluating the potential impact of Ada DX in a retrospective study. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 14(1), 1-12. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1040-6]

    This study investigates the diagnostic decision support system Ada DX, showing its potential to suggest accurate rare disease diagnoses early in the course of cases.

    Fernandes, M., et al. (2020). Clinical decision support systems for triage in the emergency department using intelligent systems: a review. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 102, 101762. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101762]

    This paper reviews the contributions of intelligent clinical decision support systems to emergency department care.

    Ford, E., et al. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of electronic clinical decision support systems: a qualitative interview study with UK general practitioners. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 1-13. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01557-z]

    This qualitative study explores the features and contexts of clinical decision support system use.

    Proposed Intervention

    Various interventions have been proposed for preventing diagnostic errors, with clinical decision support systems (CDSS) standing out as effective.

    Conclusion

    Diagnostic errors, including missed, wrong, and delayed diagnoses, pose significant risks to patient well-being. Limited research on diagnostic errors necessitates effective interventions. This study recommends the implementation of CDSS, supported by evidence indicating its efficacy in reducing diagnostic errors and ensuring patient safety.

    References

    Abimanyi-Ochom, J., Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, S., Catchpool, M., Firipis, M., Wanni Arachchige Dona, S., & Watts, J. J. (2019). Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19(1), 1-14. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0901-1]

    Fernandes, M., Vieira, S. M., Leite, F., Palos, C., Finkelstein, S., & Sousa, J. M. (2020). Clinical decision support systems for triage in the emergency department using intelligent systems: A review. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 102, 101762. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101762]

    Ford, E., Edelman, N., Somers, L., Shrewsbury, D., Lopez Levy, M., Van Marwijk, H., Curcin, V., & Porat, T. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of electronic clinical decision support systems: A qualitative interview study with UK general practitioners. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 1-13. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01557-z]

    Ronicke, S., Hirsch, M. C., Türk, E., Larionov, K., Tientcheu, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2019). Can a decision support system accelerate rare disease diagnosis? Evaluating the potential impact of Ada DX in a retrospective study. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 14(1), 1-12. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1040-6]

    NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 3 Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Literature

    Scott, I. A., & Crock, C. (2020). Diagnostic error: Incidence, impacts, causes, and preventive strategies. Medical Journal of Australia, 213(7), 302-305. [https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50771]

    Soufi, M. D., Samad-Soltani, T., Vahdati, S. S., & Rezaei-Hachesu, P. (2018). Decision support system for triage management: A hybrid approach using rule-based reasoning and fuzzy logic. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 114, 35-44. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.008]

    Trinkley, K. E., Blakeslee, W. W., Matlock, D. D., Kao, D. P., Van Matre, A. G., Harrison, R., Larson, C. L., Kostman, N., Nelson, J. A., Lin, C. T., & Malone, D. C. (2019). Clinician preferences for computerized clinical decision support for medications in primary care: A focus group study. BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 26(1), 0. [https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2019-000015]

    Willmen, T., Völkel, L., Ronicke, S., Hirsch, M. C., Kaufeld, J., Rychlik, R. P., & Wagner, A. D. (2021). Health economic benefits through the use of diagnostic support systems and expert knowledge. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 1-11. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06926-y]